Skip to main content
CK SignalsCivic intelligence
Open navigation
BriefsIssuesEventsCandidatesCommunity pollPoll insightsMethodology
FROfficial election info
All early findings

Poll context · edition 02

Treatment access still leads as neighbourhood-safety responses rise

Ten of 22 responses selected treatment access, while neighbourhood safety rose from one response in the first snapshot to five.

Snapshot captured
Aug 31, 2026, 11:59 a.m.
Method
Voluntary participation · 20-response checkpoint

Frozen snapshot

20-response checkpoint

22

responses

Movement into stable housing

31.8% · 7

Access to treatment and support· leading

45.5% · 10

Reduction in repeat emergency use

0% · 0

Neighbourhood safety and public-space conditions

22.7% · 5

Immutable historical snapshot. Responses received after August 31, 2026 belong to the next edition.

Snapshot finding

Treatment access received ten responses, stable housing received seven, neighbourhood safety received five, and repeat emergency use received none. Treatment remained first, but its share fell from 60% to 45.5%; neighbourhood safety rose from 10% to 22.7%.

Limitations

This voluntary, non-scientific checkpoint cannot establish community priorities. A zero means no participant selected the option in this snapshot; it does not show that repeat emergency use is unimportant.

PUBLIC RECORD

Facts drawn from official public records and linked to the sources below.

  1. 01

    The 2025 Housing Needs Assessment identified 215 people experiencing homelessness in February 2025 and reported that 74% of people on the local By-Name List were chronically homeless as of January 2025.

    Sources: 1

INTELLISYNC VIEW

The movement reinforces the need for one joined-up outcomes record. Treatment, housing stability, repeat crisis use and neighbourhood conditions should be tracked together so improvement in one measure is not mistaken for system-wide success.

ACCOUNTABILITY QUESTION

Can the responsible partners publish one pathway showing access, retention, housing stability, crisis use and neighbourhood outcomes over time?

Inspectable evidence

No candidate statements were used in this edition. Every source is an official public record.

  1. 01

    Municipality of Chatham-Kent Housing Needs Assessment

    Municipality of Chatham-Kent · 2026-08-31

    Open
Open the issue deskRead the method